"Usually when people are sad, they don't do anything. They just cry over their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about a change." - El-Hajj Malek El-Shabazz / Malcolm X. "De manière générale, lorsque les gens sont tristes, ils ne font rien. Ils se contentent de pleurer sur leur condition. Mais lorsqu'ils sont en colère, c'est là, qu'ils portent le changement." - El-Hajj Malek El-Shabazz / Malcolm X.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Egypt opens Rafah crossing 2 days
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Israel stands ready to bomb Iran's nuclear sites
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Algerian writer, Anouar BenMalek:
Netanyahu demands Palestinians recognize 'Jewish state'
Obama's Foreign Policy: A real Change ?
CIA's Torture Techniques
"A national security strategy needs a named enemy"
"AFTER IRAQ: THE SEARCH FOR A SUSTAINABLE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY"
Strategic Studies Institute army publication (pdf)
--
Synopsis
A sustainable national security strategy is feasible only when directed by a sustainable national security policy. In the absence of policy guidance, strategy will be meaningless. The only policy that meets both the mandates of American culture and the challenges of the outside world is one that seeks to lead the necessary mission of guarding and advancing world order. The author considers and rejects a policy that would encourage the emergence of a multipolar structure to global politics. He argues that multipolarity not only would fail to maintain order, it would also promote conflict among the inevitably rival great powers. In addition, he suggests Americans culturally are not comfortable with balance-of-power politics and certainly would not choose to promote the return of such a system. Various “pieces of the puzzle” most relevant to national security strategy are located; leading assumptions held by American policymakers and strategists are identified; alternative national security policies are considered; and necessary components of a sustainable national security strategy are specified. The author concludes that America has much less choice over its policy and strategy than the public debate suggests. He warns that the country’s dominant leadership role for global security certainly will be challenged before the century is old.
At least 700 Palestinian patients are waiting for the opening of the Rafah border
Committee to protect bloggers
Abdel Aziz Bouteflika by Plantu
Moderate Arab States Feel Popular Anger
How the US should put pressure on Israel
Shlomo Avineri lecturing George Mitchell
Egypt detains nine Bedouin over smuggling to Israel, arms trade
Lieberman: Egypt is planning to attack Israel
France: Foreigners excluded from 30% jobs
Tariq Ramadan: Obama is right
Les arguments qui placent la Turquie hors de l'histoire et de la géographie européennes ne tiennent pas à l'analyse. Pendant plus de quatre cents ans l'Empire ottoman a partagé et déterminé l'avenir politique et stratégique du continent. Il fut "l'homme malade" de l'Europe jusqu'au siècle dernier, et aujourd'hui encore son poids historique et économique reste déterminant. Redessiner les contours géographiques de l'Europe selon l'idéologie ou les nécessités politiques du moment ne trompe personne : en usant des mêmes critères, Chypre devrait aussi être hors de l'Europe, et ce découpage fait fi de l'histoire autant que des réalités concrètes du terrain où se mêlent les origines, les mémoires et les cultures. Environ 40 % de la population turque a une origine ethnique européenne, et des millions de Turcs ont déjà acquis la nationalité d'un pays européen.
Les vraies questions sont donc ailleurs, et il faut les regarder en face. Au lieu d'être obsédés par la question culturelle et religieuse (la peur de l'islam), les dirigeants européens feraient bien de développer une vraie vision géostratégique pour l'avenir : la Turquie est incontournable quant aux relations avec l'Iran, la Syrie, l'Irak et l'Asie centrale, et ses poids économique autant que militaire devraient être intégrés à une politique européenne de proximité et de stabilisation en Asie et au Moyen-Orient.
Par deux fois, récemment, le gouvernement turc a refusé de se plier aux requêtes américaines, prouvant qu'il était capable d'indépendance. L'Europe ne peut pas reprocher aux Etats-Unis leur unilatéralisme et ne se donner aucun moyen de développer une politique étrangère autonome. La cacophonie qui règne autour de ces questions est troublante : les Etats-Unis, la Chine et l'Inde n'ont pas à craindre la puissance de l'Europe, puisque celle-ci travaille contre elle-même avec ses divisions et son absence de politique commune.
Egypt says will not deal with Israel's Lieberman
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit said Cairo would not deal with ultranationalist Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Israel's Channel 2 television reported on Wednesday.
"We will work with any proposal by the Israeli government but not through the Israeli foreign minister," Abul Gheit said in an interview with Russia Today television, excerpts of which were aired on Channel 2.
Lieberman stirred controversy last year when he said Hosni Mubarak could "go to hell" if the Egyptian president did not want to visit Israel. He once suggested Egypt's Aswan Dam might be bombed.
"Of course he will not visit Cairo as long as his positions remain unchanged," Abul Gheit said.
On his first day at the foreign ministry this month, Lieberman said the U.S.-sponsored Annapolis declaration of 2007 on peace with the Palestinians was no longer valid. "A person has to think about the consequences of the signals he sends from his brain to his tongue during speech and there have been consequences for Egypt," Abul Gheit said.